Pocock's dialectical call for both 'global' contextualism as well as critical examination of the various 'multiculturalism' iterations, and the subjective, if not potentially relative, contours of such contextualism. Internal discordance seems manifest in the history of the idea of the Cambridge School, especially in regards to J.G.A. Michael Oakeshott: debates over influence Christopher Goto-Jones has argued that the school has developed in an orientalist direction by neglecting non-Western contributions to intellectual history. On the one hand, historians working in more materialist contexts such as social history have criticised the school's focus on ideas. The school has been criticised on a number of fronts. In Mark Bevir's words, Skinner and his colleagues 'defended the history of political theory against both reductionists who dismissed ideas as mere epiphenomena and canonical theorists who approached texts as timeless philosophical works'. Here, Skinner attacks what he describes as two 'orthodoxies': 'perennialism', the view that philosophers have always debated the same fundamental questions and the notion that context is irrelevant to a historical understanding of texts, which can be read as self-standing material. The text often held as the original declaration of the principles of the school is Quentin Skinner's 1969 article 'Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas'. In these terms, the Cambridge School is 'idealist' in the sense that it accepts ideas as constitutive elements of human history in themselves, and hence contradicts social-scientific positivism in historiography. The Cambridge School can broadly be characterised as a historicist or contextualist mode of interpretation, placing primary emphasis on the historical conditions and the intellectual context of the discourse of a given historical era, and opposing the perceived anachronism of conventional methods of interpretation, which it believes often distort the significance of texts and ideas by reading them in terms of distinctively modern understandings of social and political life. Pocock, Peter Laslett, John Dunn, James Tully, David Runciman, and Raymond Geuss. In intellectual history and the history of political thought, the Cambridge School is a loose historiographical movement traditionally associated with the University of Cambridge, where many of those associated with the school held or continue to hold academic positions, including Quentin Skinner, J. Not to be confused with Cambridge School of historiography or Peterhouse school of history.

Pocock the machiavellian moment